Liberating user data from the platform monopolies?

I agree, financial services is just the most obvious and maybe impactful
first step. But in places like Australia they have already signaled that
new sectors will be added, such as utilities and telecoms.

On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 4:27 AM John Kieti <> wrote:

> Thank you Rafe for the pointer to your excellent work on data sharing
> models. Still reading but the summary alone is enlightening …
> *… when consumers can freely bring their data to an open market, this
> could increase choice and push more competitive pricing and product
> terms…*
> *… These models offer insights into the rules needed to enable greater
> data sharing; how to balance data privacy with data portability; data
> sharing platform architecture; and data classifications and definitions …*
> While your work is based on the financial sector, it seems quite
> applicable to areas such as agriculture, health, education, social media,
> and retail e-commerce. I dare say user-controlled data sharing and
> independently managed data repositories could advance competition and
> innovation among our telcos. From the thread on IGF am intrigued by the
> prospect of user identity, data ownership and control, and data histories
> taking center stage in the agenda.
> @Twahir am curious; considering the rate of change in the technology
> landscape, why do you think these approaches to the data value chain may
> not materialize in our lifetime? 🙂
> Kind regards
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:21 PM Rafe Mazer <> wrote:
>> John,
>> I think this is an important next step for competition in platform
>> economies. This is happening in places like Australia, UK, Mexico, and
>> would have been the case if there wasn’t that 30 day exemption in the data
>> portability language of the Data Protection Act.
>> I wrote about this last year with some speculation on how these models
>> could be applied for financial services in Kenya and a few other markets:
>> Happy to discuss further if ever of interest
>> Rafe
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:10 AM John Kieti via kictanet <
>>> wrote:
>>> Dear Listers,
>>> Just a random thought. What if the law entitled users to a periodic
>>> (eg. quarterly) download of all data collected of them by large platform
>>> companies (including telcos); and the users could grant file access to the
>>> competitors as the user migrates? What if it was API-based data access that
>>> the user could grant to third parties including competitors?
>>> What if there was an automated data depository eg. for telcos; whereby I
>>> can invoke the right to access all the data the telco holds of me, and I
>>> proceed to grant the data depository access to my data, automatically
>>> retrieved from my telco A. That way my data *anonymized or otherwise
>>> permitted* can be accessible from the depository and aggregated with
>>> other peoples’ to develop services on top of the data layer by third
>>> parties such as startups, data mining & research services, and even telco B
>>> which competes as an underdog with telco A.
>>> The assumption would be that the user owns the data held by the
>>> platform/telco which has already got its head start with appropriating my
>>> data by collecting it in realtime. It would also be assumed that access to
>>> my data in the depository is only by licensed entities under stringent
>>> rules that respect my access permission settings.
>>> What could go wrong with such an approach to user data? What could go
>>> well?
>>> Any thoughts?
>>> —
>>> John Kieti
>>> Phone: +254-735-764242 // +254-722-764242
>>> Twitter: @johnKieti // Skype: jkieti
>>> Blog: <> // LinkedIn:
>>>*kieti* <>
>>> The ordinary just won’t do
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> Twitter:
>>> Facebook:
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people’s times and bandwidth,
>>> share knowledge, don’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
> —
> John Kieti
> Phone: +254-735-764242 // +254-722-764242
> Twitter: @johnKieti // Skype: jkieti
> Blog: <> // LinkedIn:
>*kieti* <>
> The ordinary just won’t do

kictanet mailing list

KICTANet Admin information

Related Posts

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.