OUR PLATFORM
Discussions on topical ICT issues
Listers
Platform objective
To improve the effectiveness of ICT policy and regulatory processes by expanding support for ICT initiatives, providing support for member’s actions and audience for member’s ideas. Click to Join the platform today.
We need to have one unified ict body than many multiples grouping. That’s why there are no common stand On Dec 18, 2017 9:06 AM, “Bernard Kioko via kictanet”
CS Mucheru, Thank you for your reply. I like to think solutions. Bwana CS, I consider this statement a good challenge to the industry “As it stands, what position has
Our insistence on fixing things that are not broken will be the death of us We have been calling ourselves the silicon Savannah, hub of innovation, hotbed of ideas etc
Our insistence on fixing things that are not broken will be the death of us We have been calling ourselves the silicon Savannah, hub of innovation, hotbed of ideas etc
@Fiona I stand by my statement. We DID NOT mandate KEPSA to speak on our behalf but we created an inclusive team. This was a partnership. Even the letter to
Fiona I stand by my statement. We DID NOT mandate KEPSA to speak on our behalf but we created an inclusive team. And yes that team was specifically set up
For the record KICTANet was opposed to the ICT practitioners bill. Please see the submission to parliament www.kictanet.or.ke/?page_id=28886 On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Ahmed Mohamed Maawy via
Question re standards…What are we modelling on? Who is the standards body in Silicon Valley? Estonia? India? South Africa? How does Google hire in Kenya? Africa? Facebook? Who were the
Dear Ali You were with us at KEPSA Offices when we asked that KICATNET nominate representatives to work with us on the ICT Practitioners Bill. Because we want to achieve
Dear Bwana CS KICTANet NEVER asked KEPSA to handle engagements on our behalf. We engaged KEPSA to work as a team. Period. Never, did we abdicate our responsibilities to KEPSA