🤔 probably was being a bit melodramatic, but history tells us that rarely
is a gain for the people accepted by the powers that be, unless an *INFORMED
PEOPLE* who know their right go forth and demand.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 11:41 AM John Kieti via kictanet <
> Thank you Rafe for the pointer to your excellent work on data sharing
> models. Still reading but the summary alone is enlightening …
> *… when consumers can freely bring their data to an open market, this
> could increase choice and push more competitive pricing and product
> *… These models offer insights into the rules needed to enable greater
> data sharing; how to balance data privacy with data portability; data
> sharing platform architecture; and data classifications and definitions …*
> While your work is based on the financial sector, it seems quite
> applicable to areas such as agriculture, health, education, social media,
> and retail e-commerce. I dare say user-controlled data sharing and
> independently managed data repositories could advance competition and
> innovation among our telcos. From the thread on IGF am intrigued by the
> prospect of user identity, data ownership and control, and data histories
> taking center stage in the agenda.
> @Twahir am curious; considering the rate of change in the technology
> landscape, why do you think these approaches to the data value chain may
> not materialize in our lifetime? 🙂
> Kind regards
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:21 PM Rafe Mazer <email@example.com> wrote:
>> I think this is an important next step for competition in platform
>> economies. This is happening in places like Australia, UK, Mexico, and
>> would have been the case if there wasn’t that 30 day exemption in the data
>> portability language of the Data Protection Act.
>> I wrote about this last year with some speculation on how these models
>> could be applied for financial services in Kenya and a few other markets:
>> Happy to discuss further if ever of interest
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 4:10 AM John Kieti via kictanet <
>> firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>> Dear Listers,
>>> Just a random thought. What if the law entitled users to a periodic
>>> (eg. quarterly) download of all data collected of them by large platform
>>> companies (including telcos); and the users could grant file access to the
>>> competitors as the user migrates? What if it was API-based data access that
>>> the user could grant to third parties including competitors?
>>> What if there was an automated data depository eg. for telcos; whereby I
>>> can invoke the right to access all the data the telco holds of me, and I
>>> proceed to grant the data depository access to my data, automatically
>>> retrieved from my telco A. That way my data *anonymized or otherwise
>>> permitted* can be accessible from the depository and aggregated with
>>> other peoples’ to develop services on top of the data layer by third
>>> parties such as startups, data mining & research services, and even telco B
>>> which competes as an underdog with telco A.
>>> The assumption would be that the user owns the data held by the
>>> platform/telco which has already got its head start with appropriating my
>>> data by collecting it in realtime. It would also be assumed that access to
>>> my data in the depository is only by licensed entities under stringent
>>> rules that respect my access permission settings.
>>> What could go wrong with such an approach to user data? What could go
>>> Any thoughts?
>>> John Kieti
>>> Phone: +254-735-764242 // +254-722-764242
>>> Twitter: @johnKieti
>>> Blog: gmeltdown.com <www.gmeltdown.com> // LinkedIn:
>>> ke.linkedin.com/in/*kieti* <ke.linkedin.com/in/kieti>
>>> The ordinary just won’t do
>>> kictanet mailing list
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
>>> Facebook: www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
>>> Unsubscribe or change your options at
>>> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
>>> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
>>> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
>>> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
>>> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
>>> online that you follow in real life: respect people’s times and bandwidth,
>>> share knowledge, don’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
>>> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
> John Kieti
> Phone: +254-735-764242 // +254-722-764242
> Twitter: @johnKieti
> Blog: gmeltdown.com <www.gmeltdown.com> // LinkedIn:
> ke.linkedin.com/in/*kieti* <ke.linkedin.com/in/kieti>
> The ordinary just won’t do
> kictanet mailing list
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/kictanet
> Facebook: www.facebook.com/KICTANet/
> Unsubscribe or change your options at
> The Kenya ICT Action Network (KICTANet) is a multi-stakeholder platform
> for people and institutions interested and involved in ICT policy and
> regulation. The network aims to act as a catalyst for reform in the ICT
> sector in support of the national aim of ICT enabled growth and development.
> KICTANetiquette : Adhere to the same standards of acceptable behaviors
> online that you follow in real life: respect people’s times and bandwidth,
> share knowledge, don’t flame or abuse or personalize, respect privacy, do
> not spam, do not market your wares or qualifications.
kictanet mailing list